Skip to main content

Garbage collection in Java

I am starting a series of posts on the Java garbage collector and various garbage collection algorithms. Over the 10 days or so, we will examine the Java garbage collector and garbage collection algorithms. Let's begin with a brief introduction.

An executing program occupies memory. Memory is taken as new objects are created. This memory should be returned when these objects are no longer needed. If it is not, then the computer will soon run out of resources, forcing the program to a halt. In C++ we have to explicitly return an object's memory back to the system when the object is destroyed. This is also the source for many bugs in C++. Buggy code that does not return memory can very soon exhaust system resources. To eliminate such errors, and make your program more robust, Java has adopted the philosophy of automatic memory reclamation. The JVM determines when an object is no longer needed (Eg: after the variable goes out of scope), and automatically reclaims memory occupied by that object. Objects no longer needed are known as 'garbage', because; well that is what we call things we no longer need, right? Hence reclamation of un-needed heap (Java objects are always created on the heap) memory is known as garbage collection in Java.

The JVM runs the garbage collector as a background thread, which constantly monitors the heap. The exact mechanism of reclaiming memory is JVM specific. The Java Language Specification (JLS) does not mandate any particular mechanism for garbage collection, hence it is implemented by the JVM creator.

There are several well known garbage collection algorithms that are implemented by modern JVM's. Each has pros and cons in terms of memory usage and performance. Some of these algorithms are:

  • Reference counting algorithms

  • Tracing algorithms

  • Compacting algorithms

  • Copying algorithms

  • Generational algorithms

  • Adaptive algorithms

In the next post we will discuss "Reference counting algorithms"

Discuss this post in the learning forum.

Commercial Links

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Running your own one person company

Recently there was a post on PuneTech on mom's re-entering the IT work force after a break. Two of the biggest concerns mentioned were : Coping with vast advances (changes) in the IT landscape Balancing work and family responsibilities Since I have been running a one person company for a good amount of time, I suggested that as an option. In this post I will discuss various aspects of running a one person company. Advantages: You have full control of your time. You can choose to spend as much or as little time as you would like. There is also a good chance that you will be able to decide when you want to spend that time. You get to work on something that you enjoy doing. Tremendous work satisfaction. You have the option of working from home. Disadvantages: It can take a little while for the work to get set, so you may not be able to see revenues for some time. It takes a huge amount of discipline to work without a boss, and without deadlines. You will not get the benefits (insuran

Testing Groovy domain classes

If you are trying to test Grails domain class constraints by putting your unit test cases in the 'test/unit' directory, then your tests will fail because the domain objects will not have the 'valdate' method. This can be resolved in two ways: Place the test cases inside test/integration (which will slow things down) Use the method 'mockForConstraintsTests(Trail)' to create mock method in your domain class and continue writing your test cases in 'test/unit' What follows is some example code around this finding. I am working on a Groovy on Grails project for a website to help programmers keep up and refresh their skills. I started with some domain classes and then moved on to write some unit tests. When we create a Grails project using grails create-app , it creates several directories, one of which is a directory called 'test' for holding unit tests. This directory contains two directories, 'unit', and 'integration' for uni

Some thoughts on redesigning education

Some time back I read a blog post on redesigning education. It asked some very good questions. Stuff which I had been thinking of myself. I left my thoughts on the blog, but I would also like to start a conversation around these ideas with those who read this blog as well. I would like to know what other people think of the issue of redesigning (college) education. I have often thought about how college education can be improved. To answer this question, we first have to ask a very basic question. What is the purpose of education? To me, we need education for 3 things: To learn more about the world around us To lead positive constructive lives To earn a good living / fulfill our ambitions I think education has to a large extent evolved to fulfill #3 (with a bias towards earning a comfortable living). The semester system, along with multiple choice tests, and grading, has made our education system into an assembly line. Students are pushed into the assembly line, given classes, admini