Skip to main content

Android programming - Application lifecycle (Video)

This is the second video in the series of videos provided by Google on Android programming.




Index
00:00 - Introduction
01:00 - How Android integrates apps written by different authors.
07:50 - Conclusion (Ends at 08:16)


This video walks us through a hypothetical use case, where a user opens their email, reads a message which contains a link to some location. The user then clicks on the link, opens the browser and views the location on Google Maps.

While engaging in these activities, the user starts various applications (processes) and also navigates back and forth among them. The video explains how Android manages resources and the application stack so the user can navigate across their apps seamlessly.

My Takeaway
From the video it seems like Android supports a maximum of 4 running processes. One of those processes is the System process, so a user can have at most 3 applications running simultaneously. However, this does not mean that a user cannot open more applications. When the user opens the 4th application, Android will automatically terminate an application, and will also revive it in a known state if the user were to go to it again.

Update:
Ram pointed out that "4 running processes" is purely a number they used in this example. He is absolutely correct. 4 is just an example (perhaps they assumed 64 MB RAM on the phone...). The real number depends on the amount of memory (RAM) available on the phone.

Comments

Ram said…
Hey Parag,
I think the 4 applications are just an example and I guess you can lot more applications.
Parag said…
Hi Ram,

I checked out a couple other videos. I think the number (4) is dependent on the amount of memory available on the phone.

I think in this example they assumed 64 MB of RAM, in which case about 20 MB is available for applications. I believe this supports at most 4 apps. I am not totally sure of these numbers, but that's the impression I got in another video.

Popular posts from this blog

My HSQLDB schema inspection story

This is a simple story of my need to inspect the schema of an HSQLDB database for a participar FOREIGN KEY, and the interesting things I had to do to actually inspect it. I am using an HSQLDB 1.8 database in one of my web applications. The application has been developed using the Play framework , which by default uses JPA and Hibernate . A few days back, I wanted to inspect the schema which Hibernate had created for one of my model objects. I started the HSQLDB database on my local machine, and then started the database manager with the following command java -cp ./hsqldb-1.8.0.7.jar org.hsqldb.util.DatabaseManagerSwing When I tried the view the schema of my table, it showed me the columns and column types on that table, but it did not show me columns were FOREIGN KEYs. Image 1: Table schema as shown by HSQLDB's database manager I decided to search on StackOverflow and find out how I could view the full schema of the table in question. I got a few hints, and they all pointed to

Fuctional Programming Principles in Scala - Getting Started

Sometime back I registered for the Functional Programming Principles in Scala , on Coursera. I have been meaning to learn Scala from a while, but have been putting it on the back burner because of other commitments. But  when I saw this course being offered by Martin Odersky, on Coursera , I just had to enroll in it. This course is a 7 week course. I will blog my learning experience and notes here for the next seven weeks (well actually six, since the course started on Sept 18th). The first step was to install the required tools: JDK - Since this is my work machine, I already have a couple of JDK's installed SBT - SBT is the Scala Build Tool. Even though I have not looked into it in detail, it seems like a replacement for Maven. I am sure we will use it for several things, however upto now I only know about two uses for it - to submit assignments (which must be a feature added by the course team), and to start the Scala console. Installed sbt from here , and added the path

Inheritance vs. composition depending on how much is same and how much differs

I am reading the excellent Django book right now. In the 4th chapter on Django templates , there is an example of includes and inheritance in Django templates. Without going into details about Django templates, the include is very similar to composition where we can include the text of another template for evaluation. Inheritance in Django templates works in a way similar to object inheritance. Django templates can specify certain blocks which can be redefined in subtemplates. The subtemplates use the rest of the parent template as is. Now we have all learned that inheritance is used when we have a is-a relationship between classes, and composition is used when we have a contains-a relationship. This is absolutely right, but while reading about Django templates, I just realized another pattern in these relationships. This is really simple and perhaps many of you may have already have had this insight... We use inheritance when we want to allow reuse of the bulk of one object in other