Skip to main content

Custom JSON Encoder in Django

I have been messing around with how to display date formats (in questions and answers) for my web based learning site from the past couple days. After trying various things, I settled for what seems to be a web 2.0 standard for displaying dates - displaying dates as '2 days 4 hours ago' instead of the actual date and time '4th August, 2009 5:50 PM'. I like this because I do not have to deal with any browser localization issues. Everything is a delta between the UTC time a question was asked and the current UTC time (btw if you are working with datetime in Python, do read this blog post).

In my Django based application, I use JQuery to get questions and answers for forums on every topic page. The application sends back JSON to the Javascript functions which display the questions and answers from the JSON objects.

The DjangoJSONEncoder (scroll to the end of this module) provided by Django serializes dates in a specific format. I wanted to change this so that a date would be serialized as '2 days ago'.

A bit of Googling bought me to Jessy's very nice blog post, which explained very nicely how to create a custom Encoder to be used for serializing objects in Python. This seemed like a good idea, so I wrote my custom encoder to change the way dates are displayed;


class Web20DatesEncoder(DjangoJSONEncoder):
SECONDS_IN_HR = 60 * 60
SECONDS_IN_MIN = 60
def default(self, object):
if isinstance(object, datetime.datetime):
delta = datetime.datetime.now() - object
return self.get_delta_as_string(delta)
else:
return super(Web20DatesEncoder, self).default(object)

def get_delta_as_string(self, delta):
days = delta.days
seconds = delta.seconds
hours = 0
minutes = 0
hours = seconds / self.SECONDS_IN_HR
seconds = seconds % self.SECONDS_IN_HR
minutes = seconds / self.SECONDS_IN_MIN
seconds = seconds % self.SECONDS_IN_MIN
delta_str = ''
if days > 0:
delta_str += str(days) + ' days, '
if hours > 0:
delta_str += str(hours) + ' hours, '
if days <= 0 and seconds > 0:
delta_str += str(seconds) + ' secs, '
return delta_str


However, I could not figure out how to hook this class into the call chain so that it is used when my QuerySet is serialized as such;


res = serializers.serialize(”json”, questions)


One solution which came up was to use the 'cls' parameter in the call to serialize.


res = serializers.serialize(”json”, questions, cls=Web20DatesEncoder)


However, when I ran my code, there was an error:

dump() got multiple values for keyword argument ‘cls’

Why do we get this error? Maybe (I still do understand Python well enough to be sure) because, the end_serialization method in django.core.Serializers.json.Serializer has the following line:

simplejson.dump(self.objects, self.stream, cls=DjangoJSONEncoder, **self.options)

As you can see it specifically passes cls=DjangoJSONEncoder to simplejson.dump(...), and this is the reason why we get the above error message.

Now I do not know what is the right way to resolve this issue, but here's how I did it. I created a subclass of JSONSerializer, such that my subclass used my custom encoder.


from django.core.serializers.json import Serializer as JSONSerializer

class DateModifyingJSONSerializer(JSONSerializer):
def end_serialization(self):
self.options.pop('stream', None)
self.options.pop('fields', None)
simplejson.dump(self.objects, self.stream, cls=Web20DatesEncoder, **self.options)

and the client code which earlier instantiated JSONSerializer now uses DateModifyingJSONSerializer.


#Here is the code snippet which uses the above class
json_serializer = DateModifyingJSONSerializer()
res = json_serializer.serialize(query_set)

#instead of old code shown below
#serializers.get_serializer("json")()
#res = json_serializer.serialize(query_set)


I hope you find this solution useful. Please leave a comment if it helped you, or if you know a better way to perform this task.

Comments

JessyKate said…
very cool! thanks for posting your solution (and linking me to it :)).

Popular posts from this blog

Running your own one person company

Recently there was a post on PuneTech on mom's re-entering the IT work force after a break. Two of the biggest concerns mentioned were : Coping with vast advances (changes) in the IT landscape Balancing work and family responsibilities Since I have been running a one person company for a good amount of time, I suggested that as an option. In this post I will discuss various aspects of running a one person company. Advantages: You have full control of your time. You can choose to spend as much or as little time as you would like. There is also a good chance that you will be able to decide when you want to spend that time. You get to work on something that you enjoy doing. Tremendous work satisfaction. You have the option of working from home. Disadvantages: It can take a little while for the work to get set, so you may not be able to see revenues for some time. It takes a huge amount of discipline to work without a boss, and without deadlines. You will not get the benefits (insuran

Some thoughts on redesigning education

Some time back I read a blog post on redesigning education. It asked some very good questions. Stuff which I had been thinking of myself. I left my thoughts on the blog, but I would also like to start a conversation around these ideas with those who read this blog as well. I would like to know what other people think of the issue of redesigning (college) education. I have often thought about how college education can be improved. To answer this question, we first have to ask a very basic question. What is the purpose of education? To me, we need education for 3 things: To learn more about the world around us To lead positive constructive lives To earn a good living / fulfill our ambitions I think education has to a large extent evolved to fulfill #3 (with a bias towards earning a comfortable living). The semester system, along with multiple choice tests, and grading, has made our education system into an assembly line. Students are pushed into the assembly line, given classes, admini

Testing Groovy domain classes

If you are trying to test Grails domain class constraints by putting your unit test cases in the 'test/unit' directory, then your tests will fail because the domain objects will not have the 'valdate' method. This can be resolved in two ways: Place the test cases inside test/integration (which will slow things down) Use the method 'mockForConstraintsTests(Trail)' to create mock method in your domain class and continue writing your test cases in 'test/unit' What follows is some example code around this finding. I am working on a Groovy on Grails project for a website to help programmers keep up and refresh their skills. I started with some domain classes and then moved on to write some unit tests. When we create a Grails project using grails create-app , it creates several directories, one of which is a directory called 'test' for holding unit tests. This directory contains two directories, 'unit', and 'integration' for uni