Skip to main content

Groovy beans

A typical Java Bean is a Java class which is serializable, has a public no-arg constructor, private attributes, and getter/setter methods. I'd say this is a lot of stuff for a simple pojo.

Groovy beans did to pojo's what Java could not. They are actually simple. A typical Groovy bean needs to implement java.io.Serializable and add properties to it. We do not need to add any getters/setters, they are added automatically for us.

Here is a simple Groovy bean.


class Customer implements java.io.Serializable {
String firstName //will be a private attribute in the bytecode
String lastName //will be a private attribute
def middleInitial //beans can even contain dynamic properties
}


See.... Groovy beans do not have any getters or setters, and you will also have noticed that the fields are not private. Even though the source does not contain getter/setter methods and private attributes, the bytecode does. When this bean is converted into bytecode all attributes which do not have an access modifier will be treated as properties. What this means is, they will become private attributes and public getter/setter methods will be generated for them.

Now let's create an instance of this bean.


def customer = new Customer()
//Even though this looks like we are accessing public fields
//the bytecode actually invokes the setter methods of these properties
customer.firstName = "John"
customer.lastName = "Gardner"
customer.middleInitial = "U"
println 'Customer's Last Name: ' + customer.lastName


Creating an instance of a Groovy bean is very similar to Java, but assigning values to it's properties seems to be a bit different. When we assign the value "John" to firstName, it seems as if we are assigning a value to a public field. But this is not what happens. Internally Groovy converts this into a call to the setter method for that field. Thus we get the same end result as in Java, but with less verbosity.

We can also use the bean constructor to instantiate and initialize the bean together.


def customer1 = new Customer(firstName: "Bob",
lastName: "Steele",
middleInitial: "Z")


In the above code this is what really happens under the hoods. First the constructor is invoked, followed by calls to the corresponding setter methods.

This is wonderful. Groovy Beans are just like Java Beans, but much simpler and smaller.

Now, you must be thinking, but what if I want to add custom code to the getter or setter? That is simple, simply create your own getter or setter and Groovy will use your code instead of automatically generating it's getter or setter. Your getter/setter can either be public or even protected if you so wish.

But what if we want to create a simple field without getters and setters. How do we prevent Groovy from automatically inserting getter/setters in the bytecode. Again simply create a field and give it an access modifier (like 'private') and Groovy will not auto generate anything for you.

One question that comes to mind, is how do we create package private attributes? Since Groovy 1.6, a package private field can be created by annotating it with @PackageScope

Comments

Unknown said…
hey it was a great information .
keep it up!!

Popular posts from this blog

My HSQLDB schema inspection story

This is a simple story of my need to inspect the schema of an HSQLDB database for a participar FOREIGN KEY, and the interesting things I had to do to actually inspect it. I am using an HSQLDB 1.8 database in one of my web applications. The application has been developed using the Play framework , which by default uses JPA and Hibernate . A few days back, I wanted to inspect the schema which Hibernate had created for one of my model objects. I started the HSQLDB database on my local machine, and then started the database manager with the following command java -cp ./hsqldb-1.8.0.7.jar org.hsqldb.util.DatabaseManagerSwing When I tried the view the schema of my table, it showed me the columns and column types on that table, but it did not show me columns were FOREIGN KEYs. Image 1: Table schema as shown by HSQLDB's database manager I decided to search on StackOverflow and find out how I could view the full schema of the table in question. I got a few hints, and they all pointed to ...

Commenting your code

Comments are an integral part of any program, even though they do not contribute to the logic. Appropriate comments add to the maintainability of a software. I have heard developers complain about not remembering the logic of some code they wrote a few months back. Can you imagine how difficult it can be to understand programs written by others, when we sometimes find it hard to understand our own code. It is a nightmare to maintain programs that are not appropriately commented. Java classes should contain comments at various levels. There are two types of comments; implementation comments and documentation comments. Implementation comments usually explain design desicisions, or a particularly intricate peice of code. If you find the need to make a lot of implementation comments, then it may signal overly complex code. Documentation comments usually describe the API of a program, they are meant for developers who are going to use your classes. All classes, methods and variables ...

Inheritance vs. composition depending on how much is same and how much differs

I am reading the excellent Django book right now. In the 4th chapter on Django templates , there is an example of includes and inheritance in Django templates. Without going into details about Django templates, the include is very similar to composition where we can include the text of another template for evaluation. Inheritance in Django templates works in a way similar to object inheritance. Django templates can specify certain blocks which can be redefined in subtemplates. The subtemplates use the rest of the parent template as is. Now we have all learned that inheritance is used when we have a is-a relationship between classes, and composition is used when we have a contains-a relationship. This is absolutely right, but while reading about Django templates, I just realized another pattern in these relationships. This is really simple and perhaps many of you may have already have had this insight... We use inheritance when we want to allow reuse of the bulk of one object in other ...