Skip to main content

Quirks mode in browsers

Have you heard of the quirks mode in web browsers? Well I had not until a couple days back when I ran into an issue of a CSS not rendering properly in a web page I was working on.

When I made a request for the page and opened Firebug, I could see requests for the CSS files, and I could also see that they were being properly downloaded. In Firebug's CSS view, I could see that all the CSS classes which I was expecting to be applied were showing up. So, what then was the problem. By pure chance I discovered that only elements from the CSS class were being applied. All inherited elements were not being applied. I also discovered by chance that the tag in the webpage caused this behaviour. If I added a DOCTYPE, everything would render perfectly, but if I removed the DOCTYPE, then inherited CSS elements would not get rendered. Now why would that happen?

I decided to Google a bit, and found out that browsers have a quirks mode which is triggered by the absense of the DOCTYPE in the html page.

To explain very breifly, old browsers did not confirm to W3C standards for HTML as well as CSS. As a result there were a lot of (non compliant) web pages which were rendered by these browsers. Now, when browsers did start complying to web stadards, there was a problem. All these pages which were rendering perfectly would stop rendering. To resolve this issue, browsers decided to have a backwards compatibility mode, which they called the quirks mode. When this mode was triggered, the new (W3C compliant) browser would fall back to old behaviour. Now the question was, what in a web page should trigger the quirks mode in a browser? Browser makers decided to use the DOCTYPE element. So, if the DOCTYPE was present then the browser would funciton in regular mode, whereas if the DOCTYPE was not present, it would function in quirks mode.

For more information on the quirks mode, check out this article on quirksmode.org and the Wikipedia article on quirks mode.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Commenting your code

Comments are an integral part of any program, even though they do not contribute to the logic. Appropriate comments add to the maintainability of a software. I have heard developers complain about not remembering the logic of some code they wrote a few months back. Can you imagine how difficult it can be to understand programs written by others, when we sometimes find it hard to understand our own code. It is a nightmare to maintain programs that are not appropriately commented. Java classes should contain comments at various levels. There are two types of comments; implementation comments and documentation comments. Implementation comments usually explain design desicisions, or a particularly intricate peice of code. If you find the need to make a lot of implementation comments, then it may signal overly complex code. Documentation comments usually describe the API of a program, they are meant for developers who are going to use your classes. All classes, methods and variables ...
Post a Comment
Read more

My HSQLDB schema inspection story

This is a simple story of my need to inspect the schema of an HSQLDB database for a participar FOREIGN KEY, and the interesting things I had to do to actually inspect it. I am using an HSQLDB 1.8 database in one of my web applications. The application has been developed using the Play framework , which by default uses JPA and Hibernate . A few days back, I wanted to inspect the schema which Hibernate had created for one of my model objects. I started the HSQLDB database on my local machine, and then started the database manager with the following command java -cp ./hsqldb-1.8.0.7.jar org.hsqldb.util.DatabaseManagerSwing When I tried the view the schema of my table, it showed me the columns and column types on that table, but it did not show me columns were FOREIGN KEYs. Image 1: Table schema as shown by HSQLDB's database manager I decided to search on StackOverflow and find out how I could view the full schema of the table in question. I got a few hints, and they all pointed to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inheritance vs. composition depending on how much is same and how much differs

I am reading the excellent Django book right now. In the 4th chapter on Django templates , there is an example of includes and inheritance in Django templates. Without going into details about Django templates, the include is very similar to composition where we can include the text of another template for evaluation. Inheritance in Django templates works in a way similar to object inheritance. Django templates can specify certain blocks which can be redefined in subtemplates. The subtemplates use the rest of the parent template as is. Now we have all learned that inheritance is used when we have a is-a relationship between classes, and composition is used when we have a contains-a relationship. This is absolutely right, but while reading about Django templates, I just realized another pattern in these relationships. This is really simple and perhaps many of you may have already have had this insight... We use inheritance when we want to allow reuse of the bulk of one object in other ...
3 comments
Read more