Skip to main content

Creating a custom component

The primary responsibility of a component is to decode and encode data.
encode = convert request parameters to component attributes
decode = render component attributes to the view (render html mostly...)

The rendering can be directly implemented by the component or can be delegated to a renderer. We use a special renderer(s) when we want different types of rendering for that component (maybe for different display devices).

So a JSF component has 2 parts: the component + renderer

Image by Rick Hightower explaining on where rendering fits in the JSF lifecycle - Ref

All custom components have to be subclasses of UIComponent. However, we subclass UICOmponentBase which is an abstract class that gives us a skeletal implementation of UIComponent.

Creating the custom component:
As an exercise, I will create a simple custom component that renders a 5x5 grid (as an html table). Here are the steps:
  1. Create a subclass of UIComponent (I chose UIOutput, since this is an output only component, ie. we do not modify the component from the view). This class does not have any properties at the moment, since the component is a simple display component that spits out a simple table. Since we do not have any properties I have not overriden the methods for saving and restoring state. Overriding encodeEnd() and decode() and returning null from them.
  2. Implemented LabelComponentTag as a subclass of UIComponentTag. The responsibility of this class is to return the component_family and component_renderer.
  3. Wrote the TLD file defining the spanningTable tag
My custom component is throwing a NullPointerException. This is because the server was not able to locate the projects tld file. When the app reads the JSP pages, it will try to locate and load all referenced tld files. Our JSP pages, declare tags with their corresponding URI's, and web.xml maps the URI's to tld files. The app gets the tld file names from web.xml, and loads the files. When a tag needs to be rendered, the server looks up the tld file to validate the tag, and if valid it gets the UIComponentTag subclass for this tag. This files in turn tells the server the name of the JSF component. This name is mapped to an actual class in faces-config.xml. That's how the server loads the component class (some subclass of UIComponent).

Anyways, so far my problem was an improperly named tld file in web.xml.
Fixed the problem, and got the simple table exercise to run.

This seems to be the order in which various methods of the Tag class, Component class, and Backing Bean are invoked.
  1. The Tag class is instantiated
  2. Properties specified in the JSP page for that tag are set in the Tag class
  3. The runtime tries to get the type of the component by invoking the getComponentType() method of the Tag class
  4. The runtime looks in faces-config.xml (it must be looking elsewhere also because core components are not defined in faces-config.xml) to see if a component has been defined with that type (nexted tag, in the tag). It gets the fully qualified class name of the component
  5. The component is instantiated
  6. The Tag class' setProperties() method is invoked. This method is responsible for setting properties from the Tag class to the component class. Not all properties in the Tag class will have corresponding properties in the component class. Some may in which case, they will be set directly (or after some conversions). Some properties may be set in the attributes Map of the component. These properties are usually those that will not be needed directly by the component but will be used by other classes such as the Renderer. Some properties may be bound to the backing bean. These properties are saved in the component using ValueBindings (The ValueBinding class interprets the JSF-EL and figures out the property of the backing bean we want to bind to).
  7. The component is Rendered by either invoking encodeBegin() or by invoking a custom Renderer. Here we may use properties from the backing bean. We can retrieve them by using the ValueBinding object.
  8. The save of the component is saved after rendering is complete.


Popular posts from this blog

Running your own one person company

Recently there was a post on PuneTech on mom's re-entering the IT work force after a break. Two of the biggest concerns mentioned were : Coping with vast advances (changes) in the IT landscape Balancing work and family responsibilities Since I have been running a one person company for a good amount of time, I suggested that as an option. In this post I will discuss various aspects of running a one person company. Advantages: You have full control of your time. You can choose to spend as much or as little time as you would like. There is also a good chance that you will be able to decide when you want to spend that time. You get to work on something that you enjoy doing. Tremendous work satisfaction. You have the option of working from home. Disadvantages: It can take a little while for the work to get set, so you may not be able to see revenues for some time. It takes a huge amount of discipline to work without a boss, and without deadlines. You will not get the benefits (insuran

Testing Groovy domain classes

If you are trying to test Grails domain class constraints by putting your unit test cases in the 'test/unit' directory, then your tests will fail because the domain objects will not have the 'valdate' method. This can be resolved in two ways: Place the test cases inside test/integration (which will slow things down) Use the method 'mockForConstraintsTests(Trail)' to create mock method in your domain class and continue writing your test cases in 'test/unit' What follows is some example code around this finding. I am working on a Groovy on Grails project for a website to help programmers keep up and refresh their skills. I started with some domain classes and then moved on to write some unit tests. When we create a Grails project using grails create-app , it creates several directories, one of which is a directory called 'test' for holding unit tests. This directory contains two directories, 'unit', and 'integration' for uni

Some thoughts on redesigning education

Some time back I read a blog post on redesigning education. It asked some very good questions. Stuff which I had been thinking of myself. I left my thoughts on the blog, but I would also like to start a conversation around these ideas with those who read this blog as well. I would like to know what other people think of the issue of redesigning (college) education. I have often thought about how college education can be improved. To answer this question, we first have to ask a very basic question. What is the purpose of education? To me, we need education for 3 things: To learn more about the world around us To lead positive constructive lives To earn a good living / fulfill our ambitions I think education has to a large extent evolved to fulfill #3 (with a bias towards earning a comfortable living). The semester system, along with multiple choice tests, and grading, has made our education system into an assembly line. Students are pushed into the assembly line, given classes, admini