Skip to main content

The Open-Closed principle for software design

The Open-Closed principle states that the design of a software system should be open for extension, but individual classes should be closed for modification. This means that a software should be designed such that new functionality can be added by adding new classes, and by subclassing abstract classes that have already been defined. However once a class is implemented it should be closed for modifications.

Such a design can be achieved by using the "Program To An Interface" concept. This concept states that the client class must reference abstract classes instead of concrete classes. This way subclasses can be added to the system as new functionality is added, without breaking client code. Care must be taken so as not to instantiate concrete classes in the client code. The creation of concrete subclasses must be handled by object factories. The dependency inversion principle ensures proper implementation of the open-close principle.

To summarize: we must achieve extensibility in a software system by adding new classes (subclasses) and not by modifying existing classes.

Here is an example to better understand this principle.
Spec: We want to design a software which will play a selected tune on a selected musical instrument.
The system will have the following classes:
public class Tune {
}

public class Instrument {
public abstract void play(Tune tune);
}

public class Guitar extends Instrument {
public void play(Tune tune) {
//play the tune using a Guitar
}
}

public class Harmonium extends Instrument {
public void play(Tune tune) {
//play the tune using a Harmonium
}
}

The client code is the code which uses these objects and invokes the play method.
public class Jukebox {
public void playMusic() {
Tune tune = getUserSelectedTune();
Instrument instr = getUserSelectedInstrument();
instr.play(tune);
}
}

Notice that the client code (Jukebox) does not instantiate a particular instrument subclass. It simply gets the instrument (superclass) reference from a method that is responsible for creating a concrete instrument . If the specification changes and we wish to add more instruments in our system, all we have to do is create subclasses of Instrument, override the play method, and modify the method getUserSelectedInstrument(). The client code in Jukebox does not need to be changed. Incorporating the change in specification was easy and minimal code had to be touched because we used the open-closed principle.

Comments

Uvarani said…
Gives me a clear cut idea of OCP. Useful for my exam preparation. Thanks a lot.

Popular posts from this blog

My HSQLDB schema inspection story

This is a simple story of my need to inspect the schema of an HSQLDB database for a participar FOREIGN KEY, and the interesting things I had to do to actually inspect it. I am using an HSQLDB 1.8 database in one of my web applications. The application has been developed using the Play framework , which by default uses JPA and Hibernate . A few days back, I wanted to inspect the schema which Hibernate had created for one of my model objects. I started the HSQLDB database on my local machine, and then started the database manager with the following command java -cp ./hsqldb-1.8.0.7.jar org.hsqldb.util.DatabaseManagerSwing When I tried the view the schema of my table, it showed me the columns and column types on that table, but it did not show me columns were FOREIGN KEYs. Image 1: Table schema as shown by HSQLDB's database manager I decided to search on StackOverflow and find out how I could view the full schema of the table in question. I got a few hints, and they all pointed to

Fuctional Programming Principles in Scala - Getting Started

Sometime back I registered for the Functional Programming Principles in Scala , on Coursera. I have been meaning to learn Scala from a while, but have been putting it on the back burner because of other commitments. But  when I saw this course being offered by Martin Odersky, on Coursera , I just had to enroll in it. This course is a 7 week course. I will blog my learning experience and notes here for the next seven weeks (well actually six, since the course started on Sept 18th). The first step was to install the required tools: JDK - Since this is my work machine, I already have a couple of JDK's installed SBT - SBT is the Scala Build Tool. Even though I have not looked into it in detail, it seems like a replacement for Maven. I am sure we will use it for several things, however upto now I only know about two uses for it - to submit assignments (which must be a feature added by the course team), and to start the Scala console. Installed sbt from here , and added the path

Inheritance vs. composition depending on how much is same and how much differs

I am reading the excellent Django book right now. In the 4th chapter on Django templates , there is an example of includes and inheritance in Django templates. Without going into details about Django templates, the include is very similar to composition where we can include the text of another template for evaluation. Inheritance in Django templates works in a way similar to object inheritance. Django templates can specify certain blocks which can be redefined in subtemplates. The subtemplates use the rest of the parent template as is. Now we have all learned that inheritance is used when we have a is-a relationship between classes, and composition is used when we have a contains-a relationship. This is absolutely right, but while reading about Django templates, I just realized another pattern in these relationships. This is really simple and perhaps many of you may have already have had this insight... We use inheritance when we want to allow reuse of the bulk of one object in other